Comments on: The Living Matrix Part 5

By: Phil Earnhardt

Phil Earnhardt — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:33:18 +0000

Thanks, Penny. I would love to have someone explain the how or why of these instantaneous information transfers. Who exactly said that “the field” worked that way, and how did they come to that conclusion?

Those claims do not come from science. The science of quantum physics is quite clear that information can not be transferred instantaneously.

Why does Dr. Cimbal think that flocks change direction instantaneously?

Where can I ask these questions and get an answer?

I want to emphasize: if the producers of The Living Matrix said that their claims were faith-based, I would have no issue with them. But they have said that they are evidence-based, and I see no evidence for instantaneous information transfer.

Am I missing something?

By: Penny

Penny — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:02:36 +0000

Thanks for you well considered comment. The more information that can be brought out in discussion the better.

By: Phil Earnhardt

Phil Earnhardt — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:10:23 +0000

“[...] every cell is instantly connected and communicating with each other [...] transferred instantaneously throughout the field.”

Is this science or speculation? The webpage you pulled this from has no links to any scientific papers where every cell in the body can be instantly connected and communicating with every other cell.

There are certain words that these people use: “instantaneously”, “no time delay”, “no information loss”. I know of no science anywhere that talks about information propagating instantaneously. If a quantum physicist were able to create an experiment demonstrating that information was propagating instantaneously, that scientist would win the Nobel Prize just as fast.

It hasn’t happened, and it’s terrible mischief to engage in such speculation in the middle of a movie that claims to be about science.

In the movie, Dr. Dietmar Cimbal, DVM, claims that bird flocks shift “instantaneously”. Science has actually shown that direction shifts are not instantaneous. I provide a reference to that paper in my blog post: http://floatingbones.com/?p=171 . I have also posted a full review of its content at http://floatingbones.com/?p=92 .

I don’t know why these groups obsess about the term “instantaneous”. It’s a provocative concept, but there is no evidence that it’s actually happening.